VeryDarkMan’s Stand-Off with Nigerian Lawmakers: A Deep Dive into the Bobrisky Bribery Allegations

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

In recent news, Nigerian social media influencer Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, found himself in the spotlight after his dramatic appearance before the Nigerian House of Representatives. This high-profile session revolved around explosive allegations of bribery involving the controversial crossdresser, Bobrisky, and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). VeryDarkMan’s refusal to testify during the hearing has left many wondering about the next steps in this unfolding saga.

The Allegations

The controversy started when an audio clip emerged, reportedly featuring Bobrisky admitting to bribing EFCC officials with ₦15 million to drop money laundering charges against him. Bobrisky, whose real name is Idris Okuneye, also claimed in the recording that he avoided serving a six-month sentence at Kirikiri Prison in Lagos. These claims have cast a shadow over the credibility of the EFCC, raising concerns about corruption within the agency.

Following the release of this audio, the Nigerian House of Representatives summoned both Bobrisky and VeryDarkMan, alongside EFCC Chairman Ola Olukoyede, to provide clarity on the matter. However, when Bobrisky failed to attend the session, VeryDarkMan refused to speak, stating,

“I don’t know why I will be here and the person who made these allegations is not here. In the voice note, Bobrisky said something about a godfather; maybe the godfather told him not to come and nothing would happen. He has disrespected this committee by not coming here and you are trying to force me to talk,” he said.

“You are already threatening me with arrest, that you will detain me, I will stay in the cell; it’s not my first or second time. I will stay there till he is ready to talk. If Bobrisky is not here, for now, I will not say anything, if I say anything, let me die,” he added.

His firm stance has sparked further interest in the case, as he expressed frustration over Bobrisky’s absence.

https://twitter.com/dammiedammie35/status/1840773455924330953

Why VeryDarkMan Refused to Testify

VeryDarkMan’s refusal to testify without Bobrisky’s presence has raised eyebrows. His stance highlights his demand for equal accountability, emphasizing that Bobrisky, being at the center of the allegations, should face the panel alongside him.

He suggested that Bobrisky’s absence could be due to external influence, possibly from a “godfather” figure referenced in the audio recording. VeryDarkMan felt that without Bobrisky present, his own testimony would lack the full context necessary to ensure fairness. His statement,

“If Bobrisky is not here, I will not say anything,”

reflects his firm belief in the need for transparency and fairness in this investigation.

Legal Representation and Additional Evidence

Though VeryDarkMan personally declined to speak, his lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, assured the panel that they came prepared with additional evidence. He mentioned that this new evidence had not yet been shared online, adding weight to the seriousness of the case. Adeyanju also clarified that they were not unwilling to cooperate with the committee but felt that Bobrisky’s absence was a significant obstacle to ensuring that justice was served.

This suggests that VeryDarkMan and his team are waiting for the right moment to reveal further details, likely to maximize the impact of their claims and ensure that all parties involved are held accountable.

The Implications for the EFCC

The accusations against the EFCC raise questions about the institution’s integrity. If proven true, this could have far-reaching consequences for the anti-corruption body, whose mandate is to maintain the rule of law by investigating financial crimes. Allegations that such an agency could be influenced by high-profile individuals through bribes only serve to erode public trust in Nigeria’s judicial processes.

What’s Next for Bobrisky and VeryDarkMan?

The next steps in this case largely depend on whether Bobrisky appears before the panel. His absence has stalled progress, leaving both the lawmakers and the public eager for more information. There is no doubt that if Bobrisky eventually shows up, the hearing could take a new turn, potentially leading to further revelations.

For VeryDarkMan, his credibility as an influencer is on the line, as his involvement in this high-stakes situation has thrust him into the public eye more than ever before. His decision to hold back until Bobrisky is present may work in his favor, allowing him to ensure that the narrative remains balanced.

Facebooktwitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremailby feather
Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

Discover more from Anything celebrity

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

https://aiharsoreersu.net/act/files/tag.min.js?z=7571407

Discover more from Anything celebrity

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading