In recent developments, renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana has taken a bold step against popular internet personality Bobrisky. The situation stems from allegations made by Bobrisky regarding a supposed bribe for a presidential pardon. Falana’s legal team has issued a 12-hour ultimatum demanding an apology and retraction of these claims. This incident raises important questions about defamation, the responsibilities of public figures, and the legal recourse available in Nigeria.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
Understanding the Claims
Bobrisky, whose real name is Idris Okuneye, claimed that Falana sought a bribe of N10 million to facilitate a presidential pardon for him. This assertion has sparked significant backlash, prompting Falana to refute the allegations vehemently. His legal representatives stated that Bobrisky’s claims are “vicious, wicked, and reckless,” aiming to tarnish Falana’s hard-earned reputation.
The letter reads, “We are Counsel to Mr. Femi Falana SAN (hereinafter referred to as “our client) on whose behalf we write this letter regarding your slanderous statement against him.
“We have confirmed that you took advantage of your recent imprisonment to extort money from a group of artists and other members of the public. You would recall that you called Mr. Falarin Falana, popularly known as Falz, on May 4, 2024, and requested him to assist you with the sum of N3,000,000 (Three Million Naira) to secure a special place in the Kirikiri Correctional Centre.
“Even though Falz turned down your request you were quoted in a video to have said that he informed you that his father, our client, had undertaken to write a letter of pardon for you. You also said that our client had spoken to you and that the sum of N10,000,000 (Ten Million Naira) would be needed to bribe officials who would process the application for your pardon.”
It continued, “In another video, you claimed that you had paid N5,000,000 (Five Million Naira) upfront to a Senior Advocate of Nigeria in an attempt to secure a Federal Government pardon over the charges filed against you by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
“You also claimed that the Senior Advocate of Nigeria had initially requested N10,000,000 (Ten Million Naira) for his legal services but that you explained to him that you were unable to raise the full amount as your account had been frozen by the EFCC.”
Falana’s team emphasizes that Bobrisky never contacted their client regarding any form of pardon. The lawyer’s letter also criticized Bobrisky for implicating him in a fabricated scenario involving a supposed arrangement with public officials,
“In fact, you have since published a list of persons who believed your concocted story and donated millions of Naira to pay our client to write a letter of pardon and bribe some unnamed public officers on your behalf.
“Your decision to involve our client in the criminal enterprise was a figment of your fertile imagination.
“Contrary to your spurious claims, you never briefed our client to write a letter of pardon for you,” the letter reads.
which they described as an attempt to enrich himself at the expense of Falana’s reputation.
Legal Implications of Defamation
Defamation laws in Nigeria provide a framework for individuals to seek justice when their reputation is unjustly harmed. For a claim to be considered defamatory, it must be false, damaging, and made with a degree of fault, which includes negligence or actual malice. In this case, Falana’s legal team argues that Bobrisky acted recklessly by disseminating false information without verifying the facts.
“We, therefore, demand the immediate retraction of the defamatory and derogatory statements as well as an apology prominently aired or published on all the platforms to which you have disseminated the offensive statement without any justification whatsoever.
“Be advised that if we do not receive your formal retraction and apology as demanded within 12 (twelve) hours of the receipt hereof, we shall proceed with our client’s instructions to seek appropriate legal remedies, including monetary damages, against you for your incendiary defamatory statements.
“We hope that the salient issues raised herein will urgently be addressed by you in your own interest,” they added.
The demands from Falana’s representatives include a public retraction of Bobrisky’s statements across all platforms where they were originally shared. Failure to comply could lead to legal action for damages. Such a case could set a precedent for how defamation claims are handled in the entertainment industry and among public figures in Nigeria.
The Role of Public Figures in Defamation Cases
Public figures like Bobrisky often navigate a complex landscape when it comes to defamation. Their statements can reach vast audiences rapidly, amplifying the impact of any claims made, whether true or false. This situation underscores the responsibility that comes with public visibility. Individuals in the spotlight must be cautious about the allegations they make and the potential repercussions.
For Falana, whose career is built on legal advocacy and public service, this incident could significantly impact his reputation if not resolved quickly. The demand for an apology and retraction serves as a reminder that accountability is essential in maintaining trust in public discourse.
What’s Next for Bobrisky?
As the clock ticks on the 12-hour ultimatum, Bobrisky faces a critical decision. He must consider whether to comply with Falana’s demands or stand by his allegations, which could lead to a protracted legal battle. The outcome could have ramifications not only for both parties but also for the broader conversation around defamation and public accountability in Nigeria.
Public reactions to this situation are likely to be polarized, given the personalities involved and their respective followings. Social media will play a crucial role in shaping public perception, as commentary and discussions unfold in real time.
